|
(Lifecycle continued from page 5)
Our results have been variable at different locations, but one thing is constant: there is a reduction every year from the previous year of these problem species. In two separate plots, 20' by 20', on our property in Leland, we had 95% to 100% coverage of Reed Canary Grass on March 1st, 2000. After the first treatment, it was reduced to between 5% and 10% coverage in April 2000. There were re-sprouts in the fall of 2000, but less than 5% coverage. A fall spot treatment showed a 100% kill as expected, and re-sprouts were not unexpected. This year there were spring re-sprouts up to 40% coverage in the first plot and only 10% coverage in the second. There will be more re-sprouts in the spring compared to the fall because spring is the primary growing season. The key thing to remember is that every site is different and environmental conditions will make the plants respond differently every time. For an in-depth look at diversity issues related to Common Reed, please refer to Ailstock, Norman, and Bushmann in Restoration Ecology, March 2001.
REFERENCES Ailstock, M.S., Norman, C.M. and Bushmann, P.J., 2001. Common Reed Phragmites australis: Control and Effects Upon Biodiversity in Freshwater Nontidal Wetlands. Restoration Ecology, pg. 49-59, vol.9, no.1, March 2001.
Roosa, Dean M., and Runkel, Sylvan T. 1989. Wildflowers of the Tallgrass Prairie. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
|
|